Free Speech Post- Serving Freedom Daily
American Insurance Companies DECEPTIVE?
President Obama labeled American Insurance Companies as "Deceptive". This came after a study, allegedly funded by insurance companies, showed that the President's Health Care Reform will raise medical insurance premiums for all Americans and cost the government a mind staggering 1 to 2 trillion dollars. For the most part the government will collect revenues for ten years but only fund seven years of Health Care and still leave 24 million Americans uninsured. A study released by HHS Kathleen Sebelius showed a 2% increase in medical premiums contradicting the study cited by Obama. In other words, insurance premiums will be higher than the amount President Obama stated when he called the insurance companies "Deceptive".
If Health Care Reform passes who will play a central part in its management? Obama will give the "Deceptive" American Insurance Companies the reigns. Hopefully, the Insurance Companies won't be as retaliatory as the White House and raise our premiums out of spite. I do not believe the Insurance Companies and their thousands of good American employees are deceptive. Ultimately, both the insurance companies and the President are protected under Free Speech. But, it is childish to resort to name calling and denigrating a whole industry and its thousands of employees. After all, they are Americans.
Pressure and Sanctions
We heard President Obama use the words pressure and sanctions in an effort to control Iran's Nuclear Program. Terminology aimed at Iran is now directed at American industries. Fox News, United Chamber of Commerce, Insurance Companies in particular Humana are denigrated and ostracized by the Obama and his administration. Those of us in business know the danger of denigrating your fellow industries. It damages those industries with resultant lack of consumer confidence. Name calling such as calling the Insurance Companies deceptive is extremely damaging. Considering American companies as evil, deceptive and is the worst political rhetoric I've heard in over 40 years. The unemployment problem, record national debt, and dithering on Afghanistan is irresponsible. The selling out of America to foreign interests shows capitulation to powers interested in weakening the U.S. and making us subservient to the European Union and it's socialist ideals. Clean energy technology is simply a farce. To think that humans can impact the planet is ludicrous. This contrived crisis is designed to instill fear so that American monies can be transferred overseas. Cap and Trade, debt created by the Health Care Reform, a weakened Military Force, massive unemployment, and out of control spending leads to psychological strain and decreased immunity in our citizens. Combined, these cause more susceptibility to illness and death. Where's HHS, CDC and FEMA with free vaccines for this H1N1 crisis? This is tantamount to the effects of WMD- used on our own people. The time for tranquility and responsible government is now. Say no to the White House pressures and sanctions attempting to influence our thinking and governmental processes.
Seventeen states have procedures for removing elected officials such as U.S. senators. States that do not have these procedures must have them implemented. We do not have to wait for an election to remove irresponsible Congressmen or Senators. Please support us in this effort. We will need you to push this recall effort in every state.
Pork and Earmarks
Definitions of earmarks and pork vary but there are some common themes. The following paragraphs attempt to describe each in a way that is understandable and can serve as a guide to figuring out which is which.
Earmarks can be found both in legislation (also called "Hard earmarks" or "Hardmarks") and in the text of Congressional committee reports (also called "Soft earmarks" or "Softmarks"). Hard earmarks are binding and have the effect of law, while soft earmarks do not have the effect of law but by custom are acted on as if they were binding. Usually, a legislator seeks to insert earmarks that direct a specified amount of money to a particular organization or project or that directs specific exemptions from taxes or mandated fees in his/her home state or district.
Pork involves funding for government programs whose economic or service benefits are concentrated in a particular area but whose costs are spread among all taxpayers. Public works projects, certain national defense spending projects, and agricultural subsidies are common examples.